Added a comment: couldn't STATE be used for KEY -> FILENAME(s) mapping?

This commit is contained in:
yarikoptic 2017-07-11 22:05:49 +00:00 committed by admin
parent a75aa38ca2
commit 37a6bef639

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="yarikoptic"
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/f11e9c84cb18d26a1748c33b48c924b4"
subject="couldn't STATE be used for KEY -> FILENAME(s) mapping?"
date="2017-07-11T22:05:49Z"
content="""
just wondered...
at least in my attempt for zenodo special remote I did store zenodo's file deposition ID within the state to be able to request it back later on
alternative -- URL(s) I guess. Could be smth like exported:UUID/filename.
"""]]