From 3627f03996a6bb05cf6bb1636b020cb734493f56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:34:53 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...comment_2_2b7afff24ba025fe3e272ff6f607eadf._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/standalone_shim_is_segfaulting_if_IFS__61____36____39____92__013__39__/comment_2_2b7afff24ba025fe3e272ff6f607eadf._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/standalone_shim_is_segfaulting_if_IFS__61____36____39____92__013__39__/comment_2_2b7afff24ba025fe3e272ff6f607eadf._comment b/doc/bugs/standalone_shim_is_segfaulting_if_IFS__61____36____39____92__013__39__/comment_2_2b7afff24ba025fe3e272ff6f607eadf._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fa6e1d5b43 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/standalone_shim_is_segfaulting_if_IFS__61____36____39____92__013__39__/comment_2_2b7afff24ba025fe3e272ff6f607eadf._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 2""" + date="2020-07-24T18:34:37Z" + content=""" +Hmm, that patch looks pretty good, but contains a bashism in the `${IFS:-}` +and I don't actually understand what the point of that is, if seems to +say it should expand to "" if IFS is not set, but it would expand to that +anyway. +"""]]