awesome
This commit is contained in:
parent
989de2140b
commit
361f22dc72
1 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="joey"
|
||||||
|
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||||
|
date="2018-03-09T18:10:11Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
Thanks very much for building this. It looks great.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I especially appreciated the notes in DESIGN.md about how it uses git-annex
|
||||||
|
interfaces and what is fast/too slow. Please do file todo requests if there
|
||||||
|
are interface improvements that git-annex can offer to query for the data
|
||||||
|
you need.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I suppose it does not make sense to integrate the code into git-annex,
|
||||||
|
as is done for the much simpler Nautilus and Konqueror file
|
||||||
|
manager integration. git-annex-turtle is something like 33M large with all
|
||||||
|
the assets, and has a significant quantity of source code that I would
|
||||||
|
only get in the way of maintaining.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And it looks like it's easy enough to install it from the zip file.
|
||||||
|
But I do wonder if it would make sense for the git-annex.app to bundle
|
||||||
|
git-annex-turtle, so users don't need that extra step. What do you think?
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue