comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
7dabbe4520
commit
34a49661d4
1 changed files with 25 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||||
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||||
|
username="joey"
|
||||||
|
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||||
|
date="2021-03-16T18:57:55Z"
|
||||||
|
content="""
|
||||||
|
git-annex initremote caches the AWS creds locally in a file
|
||||||
|
(.git/annex/creds/uuid) and that caching must be what's happening.
|
||||||
|
I suppose with an autoinit of this particular repo.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It may be that autoinit should avoid sucking in such information, since the
|
||||||
|
user may not expect it. And also what if two S3 repos were auto-initted,
|
||||||
|
probably the creds would only work for one. There is support in the API
|
||||||
|
that remotes could use to avoid such behavior during auto-init, but not
|
||||||
|
in the external special remote protocol.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The S3 remote currently always uses S3 protocol when there are creds,
|
||||||
|
even for read operations; when there are no creds it goes on to check if
|
||||||
|
it can determinte a public url, and uses that instead. If it instead
|
||||||
|
preferred public urls, your use case would work even with the creds.
|
||||||
|
Could break other use cases though, eg if there was a public url
|
||||||
|
recorded but it didn't work and the API did, also versioned repos maybe.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So not sure I like that second approach, it seems better to use the creds,
|
||||||
|
so long as the user knowingly provided them.
|
||||||
|
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue