From 3497e9e510950ce8e3baf88f4595330a8c6c0a28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:16:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ..._4_620fd718bd2c97a6fa4ce775e311a2d6._comment | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Provide_a_way_to_white_list_local_networks___40__not_just_specific_IPs__41__/comment_4_620fd718bd2c97a6fa4ce775e311a2d6._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/Provide_a_way_to_white_list_local_networks___40__not_just_specific_IPs__41__/comment_4_620fd718bd2c97a6fa4ce775e311a2d6._comment b/doc/todo/Provide_a_way_to_white_list_local_networks___40__not_just_specific_IPs__41__/comment_4_620fd718bd2c97a6fa4ce775e311a2d6._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..af1d3ba05a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Provide_a_way_to_white_list_local_networks___40__not_just_specific_IPs__41__/comment_4_620fd718bd2c97a6fa4ce775e311a2d6._comment @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 4""" + date="2020-02-25T19:46:02Z" + content=""" +Back to the proxy question, I suppose if you have multiple internal +networks and the proxy can only access one of them (eg your DMZ), +then allowing access to the proxy is not as bad as "all". + +And then DMZ/24 makes explicit that git-annex can access everything in that +network. + +Nor am I opposed to that syntax generally (although as I user, I consider +it pretty opaque TBH, not being in the habit of counting bits in my head). +The only haskell implementation I can find is in the `ip` package, +which would be a new dependency for git-annex. +"""]]