blog for the day

This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2013-03-19 19:02:56 -04:00
parent 013976a0af
commit 33a353407a
2 changed files with 49 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
I've been running some large transfers with the assistant, and looking at
ways to improve performance. (I also found and fixed a zombie process
leak.)
----
One thing I noticed is that the assistant pushes changes to the git-annex
location log quite frequently during a batch transfer. If the files being
transferred are reasonably sized, it'll be pushing once per file transfer.
It would be good to reduce the number of pushes, but the pushes are
important in some network topologies to inform other nodes
when a file gets near to them, so they can get the file too.
Need to see if I can find a smart way to avoid some of the pushes.
For example, if we've just downloaded a file, and are queuing uploads
of the file to a remote, we probably don't need to push the git-annex
branch to the remote.
----
Another performance problem is that having the webapp open while transfers
are running uses significant CPU just for the browser to update the progress
bar. Unsurprising, since the webapp is sending the browser a new `<div>`
each time. Updating the DOM instead from javascript would avoid that;
the webapp just needs to send the javascript either a full `<div>` or a
changed percentage and quantity complete to update a single progress bar.
I'd prefer to wait on doing that until I'm able to use Fay to generate
Javascript from Haskell, because it would be much more pleasant.. will see.
----
Also a performance problem when performing lots of transfers, particularly
of small files, is that the assistant forks off a `git annex transferkey`
for each transfer, and that has to in turn start up several git commands.
Today I have been working to change that, so the assistant maintains a
pool of transfer processes, and dispatches each transfer it wants to make
to a process from the pool. I just got all that to build, although untested
so far, in the `transferpools` branch.

View file

@ -1,5 +1,14 @@
The webapp is a web server that displays a shiny interface.
## performance
Having the webapp open while transfers are
running uses significant CPU just for the browser to update the progress
bar. Unsurprising, since the webapp is sending the browser a new `<div>`
each time. Updating the DOM instead from javascript would avoid that;
the webapp just needs to send the javascript either a full `<div>` or a
changed percentage and quantity complete to update a single progress bar.
## other features
* there could be a UI to export a file, which would make it be served up