From 3248e49e423732bc645748e3eb0d04ead70d1376 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "beryllium@5bc3c32eb8156390f96e363e4ba38976567425ec" Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:00:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...t_2_fdf1d13005f8a32663643773a09cc273._comment | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/git-lfs_special_insists_on_https/comment_2_fdf1d13005f8a32663643773a09cc273._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/git-lfs_special_insists_on_https/comment_2_fdf1d13005f8a32663643773a09cc273._comment b/doc/bugs/git-lfs_special_insists_on_https/comment_2_fdf1d13005f8a32663643773a09cc273._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3b20ba13bd --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/git-lfs_special_insists_on_https/comment_2_fdf1d13005f8a32663643773a09cc273._comment @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="beryllium@5bc3c32eb8156390f96e363e4ba38976567425ec" + nickname="beryllium" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/62b67d68e918b381e7e9dd6a96c16137" + subject="comment 2" + date="2025-06-17T10:00:16Z" + content=""" +Sorry to comment on a done bug. It's just that it seems opening a forum thread is going to lose the context. + +Can I ask, why is a git url even required? Isn't that going to require that only a self-hosted git is available anyway... because you aren't going to get the specific configuration to allow git-annex to fetch .git/config for the annex id? + +I thought the git-lfs remote was only for \"blob\" storage, and so API only. Or at least, it being integrated with a git service would have been optional, not mandatory. + +The example I gave with http and non-standard port was based on running the reference implementation https://github.com/git-lfs/lfs-test-server alone. Which works when a git project is configured just local (no remotes) and then the lfs url is set. + +"""]]