From 304930f1fc952b8f2dbe019049d5e02d8eb582dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joey.kitenet.net/" Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:50:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_5_4f2a05ef6551806dd0ec65372f183ca4._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/git_pull_remote_git-annex/comment_5_4f2a05ef6551806dd0ec65372f183ca4._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/git_pull_remote_git-annex/comment_5_4f2a05ef6551806dd0ec65372f183ca4._comment b/doc/forum/git_pull_remote_git-annex/comment_5_4f2a05ef6551806dd0ec65372f183ca4._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c01f241202 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/git_pull_remote_git-annex/comment_5_4f2a05ef6551806dd0ec65372f183ca4._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joey.kitenet.net/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 5" + date="2011-12-23T16:50:26Z" + content=""" +My goal for `git-annex merge` is that users should not need to know about it, so it should not be doing expensive pulls. + +I hope that `git annex sync` will grow some useful features to support fully distributed git usage, as being discussed in [[pure_git-annex_only_workflow]]. I still use centralized git to avoid these problems myself. +"""]]