From 2d154bfa541585f2c73a912b828396d65353c9c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 16:33:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...5_94d2048dcd33712e08f2206a5182b23f._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/Windows__58___substantial_per-file_cost_for___96__add__96__/comment_15_94d2048dcd33712e08f2206a5182b23f._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/Windows__58___substantial_per-file_cost_for___96__add__96__/comment_15_94d2048dcd33712e08f2206a5182b23f._comment b/doc/bugs/Windows__58___substantial_per-file_cost_for___96__add__96__/comment_15_94d2048dcd33712e08f2206a5182b23f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0368810127 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/Windows__58___substantial_per-file_cost_for___96__add__96__/comment_15_94d2048dcd33712e08f2206a5182b23f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 15""" + date="2021-09-28T20:33:00Z" + content=""" + cmdname Types.Command Types\Command.hs:80:11-17 15.4 0.0 + +I don't trust this latest profile, because cmdname is a +a field of a data structure. There's no code there to take 15% of +runtime, it's basically following a pointer. +I think probably the profiler got confused there. + +Anyway, `git-annex smudge --clean x < x` is running as fast in that profile +as it does on linux, and is certainly nowhere near the 1.9s runtime of `git add` +that this bug report is about. I wonder if it also runs that fast for @mih? + +Possibly something else is making git add slow. +"""]]