From 1db3746ed7ad86ca7489e2b1a1ca6918534d79cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "jody.frankowski@46af27a91b08450190f627a8fba772a61e22719f" Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:31:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- .../comment_2_20ccc26b97a064075a4d0256f2287be6._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/annex_symlinks_too/comment_2_20ccc26b97a064075a4d0256f2287be6._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/annex_symlinks_too/comment_2_20ccc26b97a064075a4d0256f2287be6._comment b/doc/bugs/annex_symlinks_too/comment_2_20ccc26b97a064075a4d0256f2287be6._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a44894f1c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/annex_symlinks_too/comment_2_20ccc26b97a064075a4d0256f2287be6._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="jody.frankowski@46af27a91b08450190f627a8fba772a61e22719f" + nickname="jody.frankowski" + subject="comment 2" + date="2016-02-14T20:31:49Z" + content=""" +Both direct mode and unlocking are costly. Enabling annexing of symlinks is a very useful optimisation imho, and very important mechanism going forward with v6 repos. +"""]]