updates
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae0a10618b
commit
2bf90c7b56
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ reverse filter to draw the wrong conclusion. Maybe look at a list of what
|
||||||
objects were not present when applying the filter, and use that to decide
|
objects were not present when applying the filter, and use that to decide
|
||||||
which to not delete when reversing it?
|
which to not delete when reversing it?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So, a reverse filter may need some state that was collected when running
|
||||||
|
the filter forwards, in order to decide what to do.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## push
|
## push
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The new master branch can then be pushed out to remotes. The
|
The new master branch can then be pushed out to remotes. The
|
||||||
|
@ -273,6 +276,8 @@ adjusting filter, albeit an extreme one. This might improve view branches.
|
||||||
For example, it's not currently possible to update a view branch with
|
For example, it's not currently possible to update a view branch with
|
||||||
changes fetched from a remote, and this could get us there.
|
changes fetched from a remote, and this could get us there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This would need the reverse filter to be able to change metadata.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[WORKTREE: Wouldn't be able to integrate, unless view branches are changed
|
[WORKTREE: Wouldn't be able to integrate, unless view branches are changed
|
||||||
into adjusted view worktrees.]
|
into adjusted view worktrees.]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue