From 2b8f8838b5fb4483a50d5c9870c3c872ffb2f3f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ewen Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 02:21:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: User-Agent --- ...comment_1_4412b2d9f4ed59ff078c8efd9ae6e13f._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/importfeed_bad_request_without_User-Agent__58__/comment_1_4412b2d9f4ed59ff078c8efd9ae6e13f._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/importfeed_bad_request_without_User-Agent__58__/comment_1_4412b2d9f4ed59ff078c8efd9ae6e13f._comment b/doc/bugs/importfeed_bad_request_without_User-Agent__58__/comment_1_4412b2d9f4ed59ff078c8efd9ae6e13f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..322506b8a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/importfeed_bad_request_without_User-Agent__58__/comment_1_4412b2d9f4ed59ff078c8efd9ae6e13f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="ewen" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/605b2981cb52b4af268455dee7a4f64e" + subject="User-Agent" + date="2018-07-15T02:21:47Z" + content=""" +In theory `User-Agent:` is \"optional\", but [clients `SHOULD` send it](https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.43). Looks like some servers are particularly fussy about it being sent... and off the top of my head I can't think of a reason *not* to send a `User-Agent:` header of some sort, as it is *very* widely sent. + +Ewen +"""]]