This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2015-03-26 10:40:20 -04:00
parent 388fbac5c3
commit 2b370a8a0f
5 changed files with 0 additions and 108 deletions

View file

@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlXt6nnNs-3uw61EGYtxr_AVhJqXybwLR8"
nickname="Bruno"
subject="Why this limitation ?"
date="2015-03-25T22:33:14Z"
content="""
I do not understand this limitation ! Why the git-annex exclude the **.git** directory. If the .git is not int the root annex, what the problem ?
Effectively, for me, this limitation is a big problem for archive my working directory (it's contain a some .git folders)
more, is there a command to showing the files not in the annex after executing \"git annex add .\" exist ?
Because it's dangerous to believe that the data is in backup, but in the reality they have not saved
It's a pity, that powerful archiver tool is limited by himself, it lacks some features to be perfectly.
This does not affect your excelent work !
Regards
BA
"""]]

View file

@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlXt6nnNs-3uw61EGYtxr_AVhJqXybwLR8"
nickname="Bruno"
subject="Why this limitation ?"
date="2015-03-25T22:34:14Z"
content="""
I do not understand this limitation ! Why the git-annex exclude the **.git** directory. If the .git is not int the root annex, what the problem ?
Effectively, for me, this limitation is a big problem for archive my working directory (it's contain a some .git folders)
more, is there a command to showing the files not in the annex after executing \"git annex add .\" exist ?
Because it's dangerous to believe that the data is in backup, but in the reality they have not saved
It's a pity, that powerful archiver tool is limited by himself, it lacks some features to be perfectly.
This does not affect your excelent work !
Regards
BA
"""]]

View file

@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlXt6nnNs-3uw61EGYtxr_AVhJqXybwLR8"
nickname="Bruno"
subject="Why this limitation ?"
date="2015-03-25T22:35:13Z"
content="""
I do not understand this limitation ! Why the git-annex exclude the **.git** directory. If the .git is not int the root annex, what the problem ?
Effectively, for me, this limitation is a big problem for archive my working directory (it's contain a some .git folders)
more, is there a command to showing the files not in the annex after executing \"git annex add .\" exist ?
Because it's dangerous to believe that the data is in backup, but in the reality they have not saved
It's a pity, that powerful archiver tool is limited by himself, it lacks some features to be perfectly.
This does not affect your excelent work !
Regards
BA
"""]]

View file

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="badele"
subject="Why this limitation ?"
date="2015-03-26T06:50:40Z"
content="""
I do not understand this limitation ! Why the git-annex exclude the **.git** directory. If the .git is not in the root annex, what the problem ?
Effectively, for me, this limitation is a big problem for archive my working directory (it's contain a some .git folders)
More, is there a command to showing the files not in the annex after executing \"git annex add .\" exist ?
Because it's dangerous to believe that the data is in backup, but in the reality they have not saved
It's a pity, that powerful archiver tool is limited by himself, it lacks some features to be perfectly.
This does not affect your excelent work !
Regards
BA
"""]]

View file

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="badele"
subject="Why this limitation ?"
date="2015-03-26T06:53:46Z"
content="""
I do not understand this limitation ! Why the git-annex exclude the **.git** directory. If the .git is not in the root annex, what the problem ?
Effectively, for me, this limitation is a big problem for archive my working directory (it's contain a some .git folders)
More, is there a command to showing the files not in the annex after executing \"git annex add .\" exist ?
Because it's dangerous to believe that the data is in backup, but in the reality they have not saved
It's a pity, that powerful archiver tool is limited by himself, it lacks some features to be perfectly.
This does not affect your excelent work !
Regards
BA
"""]]