Added a comment: Adopting "git annex add" as default command in workflow
This commit is contained in:
parent
f7e2503410
commit
2a67c125e1
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="davicastro"
|
||||
avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/4e708663cf4d5b9e8cfea74caf4307fc"
|
||||
subject="Adopting "git annex add" as default command in workflow"
|
||||
date="2018-03-08T11:21:55Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
Hi, from technical point of view, are there any drawbacks/limitations on adopting a workflow of everyone in the project using \"git annex add\" and relying on the annex.largefiles settings instead of them having to use the separate commands?
|
||||
* I would use repo v5 as repo v6 seems to still need work to do, and I don't need it's features. I just would like to avoid human error of people not using by mistake regular git add for bigfiles. I understand that repo v6 would allow, but I don't like it's default behavior of using unlocked mode when I add things with git add (although it would properly annex the files, but in unlocked mode these files would occupy space in the work copy, and I don't want that). Thanks.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue