From 9b77752a93c5c1da78573218b3e6cae8c2693626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pixunil Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 20:45:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...ent_6_be59fcc5633b352eefe993871df1ec4a._comment | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Wrong_symlink_target_on_usb_drive/comment_6_be59fcc5633b352eefe993871df1ec4a._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Wrong_symlink_target_on_usb_drive/comment_6_be59fcc5633b352eefe993871df1ec4a._comment b/doc/forum/Wrong_symlink_target_on_usb_drive/comment_6_be59fcc5633b352eefe993871df1ec4a._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..83fda1a207 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Wrong_symlink_target_on_usb_drive/comment_6_be59fcc5633b352eefe993871df1ec4a._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="pixunil" + subject="comment 6" + date="2016-05-10T20:45:56Z" + content=""" +Thanks for clearing it up, so I guess it was me. +Otherwise, I have some questions: + +- Could I set `annex.crippledfilesystem` to `false` or is that dangerous on NTFS? +- Do symlinks also on Window work? (direction of the slash) +- Wouldn't it be better to modify the link target than the location of the objects? + +I'm also fine with redirecting me to a FAQ, thanks again for your time and efforts. +"""]]