Added a comment: why md5sum?
This commit is contained in:
parent
84c70b61f0
commit
2865e9ff8b
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="https://id.koumbit.net/anarcat"
|
||||
subject="why md5sum?"
|
||||
date="2015-02-13T15:59:46Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
why the extra processing to generate the hashing directories?
|
||||
|
||||
we already have a hash here, for example, `SHA256E-s8242375--5f82490990812ad3feabb02355750710a9d94283ab256d1c691c3bf8d7d9fbe3.ogg` has a loon `5f82490990812ad3feabb02355750710a9d94283ab256d1c691c3bf8d7d9fbe3` hash. Why not use the first characters of that? This is will not change for a give file, and has a higher chance of generating collisions (which is a good thing here, because we can reuse directories).
|
||||
|
||||
In other words, why aren't the hashes of `SHA256E-s8242375--5f82490990812ad3feabb02355750710a9d94283ab256d1c691c3bf8d7d9fbe3.ogg` simply `5f8/249`? --[[anarcat]]
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue