From 25e626e1ebc596664b12a12b0a6659798be71cdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://meep.pl/" Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:00:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: xmlns --- ...comment_1_f20650f93d7f0ca39b9ba3ce0380193f._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/design/assistant/xmpp/comment_1_f20650f93d7f0ca39b9ba3ce0380193f._comment diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/xmpp/comment_1_f20650f93d7f0ca39b9ba3ce0380193f._comment b/doc/design/assistant/xmpp/comment_1_f20650f93d7f0ca39b9ba3ce0380193f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7ee62eea7f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/xmpp/comment_1_f20650f93d7f0ca39b9ba3ce0380193f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://meep.pl/" + ip="193.23.174.18" + subject="xmlns" + date="2012-11-11T09:00:01Z" + content=""" +A minor point, but is saving a couple of bytes per message worth using a [deprecated feature](http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#iri-use) of the namespaces specification? This is not technically *breaking* the current specification, since \"git-annex\" is of course still a (relative) URI reference; and anyway chances of problems are, I guess, slim. But is it the lesser of two bugs? + +The shortest moderately sane absolute URI containing \"git-annex\" would probably be \"data:,git-annex\". +"""]]