From 23ff3521362bf03352e1284d48f88f2512795651 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: oliv5 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:04:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_4_cd56ee6915acb9389876b7a4b7c0e728._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Shared_pubkeys__58___decrypting_files_in_special_remotes_without_git-annex/comment_4_cd56ee6915acb9389876b7a4b7c0e728._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Shared_pubkeys__58___decrypting_files_in_special_remotes_without_git-annex/comment_4_cd56ee6915acb9389876b7a4b7c0e728._comment b/doc/forum/Shared_pubkeys__58___decrypting_files_in_special_remotes_without_git-annex/comment_4_cd56ee6915acb9389876b7a4b7c0e728._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a063c28025 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Shared_pubkeys__58___decrypting_files_in_special_remotes_without_git-annex/comment_4_cd56ee6915acb9389876b7a4b7c0e728._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="oliv5" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/d7f0d33c51583bbd8578e4f1f9f8cf4b" + subject="comment 4" + date="2018-07-16T17:04:06Z" + content=""" +Yes, I had a look at the cipher, and I cannot tell much about it. It is ... random :) And yes, I tried the removal of the '\n' characters like in pubkey encryption scheme, with no success so far. + +I'll post my test script, which is a basic variation of the one given in [Decrypting_files_in_special_remotes_without_git-annex](https://git-annex.branchable.com/tips/Decrypting_files_in_special_remotes_without_git-annex/) to make multiple calls to lookup_key(). +"""]]