From 211486472bdbe7c5262a02a97e5398e28f066765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "windfish@91c7bac51a452080189a071094cb6f914fe3435b" Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:53:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment: combine worm with partial hash --- .../comment_35_8ac9d37cc2a7b0b361cf686fe27192dd._comment | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/backends/comment_35_8ac9d37cc2a7b0b361cf686fe27192dd._comment diff --git a/doc/backends/comment_35_8ac9d37cc2a7b0b361cf686fe27192dd._comment b/doc/backends/comment_35_8ac9d37cc2a7b0b361cf686fe27192dd._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7c403b88af --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/backends/comment_35_8ac9d37cc2a7b0b361cf686fe27192dd._comment @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="windfish@91c7bac51a452080189a071094cb6f914fe3435b" + nickname="windfish" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/648c1b6a023d94a30193b1b428c8d373" + subject="combine worm with partial hash" + date="2024-02-01T11:53:54Z" + content=""" +would it be possible to provide a combined backend of worm + partial hash? i'd imagine that this would make the backend faster than merely hashes while also lower the probability of erroneously identifying two different, but worm-equivalent files. +"""]]