From 1f70ea119b099a7b3e5e4d5cf0c14534f9eca007 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:11:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...ment_1_f5a7d7e4ac5d9885230d08684416cff4._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/ancient_linux_build_for_arm__63__/comment_1_f5a7d7e4ac5d9885230d08684416cff4._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/ancient_linux_build_for_arm__63__/comment_1_f5a7d7e4ac5d9885230d08684416cff4._comment b/doc/forum/ancient_linux_build_for_arm__63__/comment_1_f5a7d7e4ac5d9885230d08684416cff4._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8d306400c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/ancient_linux_build_for_arm__63__/comment_1_f5a7d7e4ac5d9885230d08684416cff4._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2020-06-16T16:05:01Z" + content=""" +Unfortunately my attempt at this earlier failed + + +And of course ancient systems are not getting any better over time, so the +only thing that would succeed is to move the goalposts up some, eg from +armel to armhf (arm 7). But that would almost certianly need a newer kernel +than 2.6.32 to support it. +"""]]