From ffdf67efdb9148ec15edc4c31e05e48d8a994ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:38:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Added a comment --- ...comment_1_9c9e5f2ee5ae4d8459358ad16f879ef1._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/preferred_content/comment_1_9c9e5f2ee5ae4d8459358ad16f879ef1._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/preferred_content/comment_1_9c9e5f2ee5ae4d8459358ad16f879ef1._comment b/doc/forum/preferred_content/comment_1_9c9e5f2ee5ae4d8459358ad16f879ef1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..24de5840b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/preferred_content/comment_1_9c9e5f2ee5ae4d8459358ad16f879ef1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="209.250.56.47" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-11-07T18:38:22Z" + content=""" +The first version of git-annex to support preferred content settings was 3.20121009. + +There is a quite up-to-date backport available for Debian stable. +"""]] From b879e4227be534f0629b278615f762d7af080b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkkyBDsfOB7JZvPZ4a8F3rwv0wk6Nb9n48" Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:40:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Added a comment --- ..._7832f0347a41b8204538c01b72487803._comment | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/_Does_git_annex_find___40____38___friends__41___batch_queries_to_the_location_log__63__/comment_4_7832f0347a41b8204538c01b72487803._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/_Does_git_annex_find___40____38___friends__41___batch_queries_to_the_location_log__63__/comment_4_7832f0347a41b8204538c01b72487803._comment b/doc/forum/_Does_git_annex_find___40____38___friends__41___batch_queries_to_the_location_log__63__/comment_4_7832f0347a41b8204538c01b72487803._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3e7eb01dba --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/_Does_git_annex_find___40____38___friends__41___batch_queries_to_the_location_log__63__/comment_4_7832f0347a41b8204538c01b72487803._comment @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkkyBDsfOB7JZvPZ4a8F3rwv0wk6Nb9n48" + nickname="Abdó" + subject="comment 4" + date="2013-11-07T18:40:27Z" + content=""" +Ok, thanks. + +I understand that annex is more sophisticated than what I'm proposing. I'm also +not comparing apples to oranges, what I'm saying is this: All the +logic and checking and git calls that I thought annex needs to do, take +much much less time than those 55 seconds. So either I'm missing something big (about 98% of it in execution time), or +annex is doing something very inefficient. That's all I'm saying, and I was +hoping that you could clarify that, since you already know the code. + +Also I'm sorry for being so annoying. If annex were writen in C, I would either have understood those 55 seconds or sent you a patch making annex faster. Being in +haskell means that it will take me considerably more time and effort. But if I manage to +improve things and if it is ok with you I'll send you patches... eventually. +"""]]