From 18efb40c85ec1fb16a57eb394978626188d68b53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:49:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comment --- ...ment_4_8c6aa3f5aee359f2f161b6664cdb5c32._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/option_to_put_temp_files_on_a_RAM_disk/comment_4_8c6aa3f5aee359f2f161b6664cdb5c32._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/option_to_put_temp_files_on_a_RAM_disk/comment_4_8c6aa3f5aee359f2f161b6664cdb5c32._comment b/doc/todo/option_to_put_temp_files_on_a_RAM_disk/comment_4_8c6aa3f5aee359f2f161b6664cdb5c32._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8d38464e46 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/option_to_put_temp_files_on_a_RAM_disk/comment_4_8c6aa3f5aee359f2f161b6664cdb5c32._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 4""" + date="2020-01-30T16:44:52Z" + content=""" +When git-annex downloads chunks, it uses a single file and seeks forward to +the next chunk boundry when resuming, for example. + +I agree with chrysn's analysis on all points. + +Also, this smells of premature optimisation, and tying it to features that +have not even been agreed on, let alone implemented or profiled, is weird. +"""]]