From 1658fcbccbe5aac4f0d8588eb880f1ce03b539fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:13:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...mment_5_f6ebaccadcfe9381c83be201b19debb1._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_5_f6ebaccadcfe9381c83be201b19debb1._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_5_f6ebaccadcfe9381c83be201b19debb1._comment b/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_5_f6ebaccadcfe9381c83be201b19debb1._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a35d2b6f6c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/upgraded_annex__44___suddenly_trying_to_grab_archive_content_onto_client_again/comment_5_f6ebaccadcfe9381c83be201b19debb1._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 5" + date="2013-04-27T21:13:23Z" + content=""" +I'm glad this wasn't a bug! + +I'm not really sold on its current behavior WRT archive directories and backups. It seemed to make sense at the time.. + +Nor am I entirely thrilled with the current hardcoded \"(copies=archive:1 or copies=smallarchive:1)\" that makes any given file be stored in only 1 archive repository. `numcopies` doesn't seem quite the right thing to put in place of that `1 +"""]]