From 15601f2b66f9ef7fdb504e6a4b6e4bccf8f162a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: supernaught Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:01:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...mment_2_9ad4c9b2217f739e67198d16d14d32e7._comment | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Invert_remote_selection/comment_2_9ad4c9b2217f739e67198d16d14d32e7._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/Invert_remote_selection/comment_2_9ad4c9b2217f739e67198d16d14d32e7._comment b/doc/todo/Invert_remote_selection/comment_2_9ad4c9b2217f739e67198d16d14d32e7._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5acf39f956 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Invert_remote_selection/comment_2_9ad4c9b2217f739e67198d16d14d32e7._comment @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="supernaught" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/55f92a50f2617099e2dc7509130ce158" + subject="comment 2" + date="2017-08-28T22:01:23Z" + content=""" +It's not very ergonomic to type out so much each for each sync, but I suppose it technically accomplishes the idea. + +Still -- wouldn't making '\!x' alias to '-c remote.x.annex-sync=false' have minimal impact and provide a bit more symmetry with the matching-options? + +I'm not familiar with Haskell, but could probably fumble my way through this one. Would you accept a patch? +"""]]