diff --git a/doc/bugs/WebDAV_HandshakeFailed_/comment_7_6c51b6c7dd477d8911dd9a7a5c41ea2e._comment b/doc/bugs/WebDAV_HandshakeFailed_/comment_7_6c51b6c7dd477d8911dd9a7a5c41ea2e._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9a7036ff06 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/WebDAV_HandshakeFailed_/comment_7_6c51b6c7dd477d8911dd9a7a5c41ea2e._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="annexuser" + ip="50.46.189.77" + subject="comment 7" + date="2013-03-17T01:29:48Z" + content=""" +It's working now! Thanks! +"""]] diff --git a/doc/bugs/uploads_queued_to_annex-ignore_remotes.mdwn b/doc/bugs/uploads_queued_to_annex-ignore_remotes.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..549147dccb --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/uploads_queued_to_annex-ignore_remotes.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +## What steps will reproduce the problem? + +After the assistant idles for a while, it queues many transfers to remotes configured annex-ignore=true + +##What is the expected output? What do you see instead? + +No attempts to upload to repos marked 'annex-ignore=true' + +Instead I see many queued transfers to the remote 'origin' + +[Screenshot](https://www.evernote.com/shard/s1/sh/ea0de76c-4b68-4266-b9f6-8a9c343997b6/72baab4a3ce73b0915b151829bbeaf75/res/8a8ab1fb-3173-47ea-875d-b0e320cb827b/skitch.png) + +##What version of git-annex are you using? On what operating system? + + % > git annex version + git-annex version: 4.20130315 + local repository version: 3 + default repository version: 3 + supported repository versions: 3 4 + upgrade supported from repository versions: 0 1 2 + build flags: Assistant Webapp Pairing Testsuite S3 WebDAV FsEvents XMPP DNS + +Mac OSX 10.8.2 Build 12C3006 + +##Please provide any additional information below. + +The remote in question: + + [remote "origin"] + url = git@git.example.com:annex-home + fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* + annex-ignore = true diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_1_299462bcdd0e4f6cd7895b5f40ca00ad._comment b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_1_299462bcdd0e4f6cd7895b5f40ca00ad._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7d28cfdbf8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_1_299462bcdd0e4f6cd7895b5f40ca00ad._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnR7hb8IaKB3IKZptRukje0yahmhfLOO98" + nickname="Adam" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-03-17T00:30:26Z" + content=""" +> Made UI changes to encourage user to install git-annex on the server when adding a ssh server, rather than just funneling them through to rsync. + +What's the difference between having git-annex available versus not? +"""]] diff --git a/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_2_1913d65dfe4ba08379d82a4a2ca91c40._comment b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_2_1913d65dfe4ba08379d82a4a2ca91c40._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..200846545c --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/design/assistant/blog/day_216__more_bugfixes/comment_2_1913d65dfe4ba08379d82a4a2ca91c40._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnxp2XU8gIribhhGhGuYtU6eMMwHv5gUGI" + nickname="Amitai" + subject="Google Talk silently drops non-Google invites (at least)" + date="2013-03-17T13:44:18Z" + content=""" +Have you seen ? Maybe they're also doing other funny stuff that gets in your way. +"""]] diff --git a/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d719b2feb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Is there a way to check if a special remote is setup to use GPG? And, if so, see the ID of keys that it is encrypting to? diff --git a/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__/comment_1_db8ce8ef50fc33a28860ee475988450f._comment b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__/comment_1_db8ce8ef50fc33a28860ee475988450f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ff073cd9a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Check_if_remote_is_using_GPG__63__/comment_1_db8ce8ef50fc33a28860ee475988450f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-03-17T18:59:40Z" + content=""" +You can tell this by looking at remote.log: + +git show git-annex:remote.log + +Remotes that are encrypted will have a big \"cipher=\" block in there, and ones that are encrypted to gpg public keys will have a list of the keys following \"cipherkeys=\" + + +"""]] diff --git a/doc/forum/Howto_remove_a_repository__63__/comment_1_b55fa4e92bb457ecaa5ca8f5cee7be1d._comment b/doc/forum/Howto_remove_a_repository__63__/comment_1_b55fa4e92bb457ecaa5ca8f5cee7be1d._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..642da6575f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Howto_remove_a_repository__63__/comment_1_b55fa4e92bb457ecaa5ca8f5cee7be1d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-03-17T19:05:27Z" + content=""" +There's no UI for it in the assistant. [[Relevant bug report|bugs/The_webapp_doesn't_allow_deleting_repositories]] +"""]] diff --git a/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__.mdwn b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..60942584b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +I have the webapp setup to manage 4 different repositories. + +One repository had many gigabytes to upload to a remote. As this was moving along, I wanted to check on the status of one of the other repositories. I knew that this second repository had a lot of data to download. When I switched to the second repo in the webapp, I noticed in my network monitor that the amount of upstream bandwidth I was using dropped and the amount of downstream bandwidth increased. I switched back to the first repo, and my downstream bandwidth dropped and the upstream bandwidth increased. + +It looks like git-annex stopped uploading data from the first repo when I switched to the second, and stopped downloading data to the second repo when I switched to the first. Is this correct? I was under the impression that switching repositories in the webapp simply changed the view that I was looking at, but that the assistant would still be managing all the repositories I had setup -- uploading/downloading/syncing concurrently. diff --git a/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__/comment_1_ebec1ddad71e961cdc9b21cbddfbcdaf._comment b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__/comment_1_ebec1ddad71e961cdc9b21cbddfbcdaf._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c1c5cd9179 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Managing_multiple_repositories_concurrently__63__/comment_1_ebec1ddad71e961cdc9b21cbddfbcdaf._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + nickname="joey" + subject="comment 1" + date="2013-03-17T18:53:26Z" + content=""" +Each repository gets its own git-annex assistant daemon, which is entirely separate from the daemons used by other repositories. + +The only affect that switching which repository is in view in the webapp can have is it can start a daemon running on a repository that for some reason did not already have the daemon running. This could happen if it was not set to autostart on login, for example. +"""]] diff --git a/doc/forum/Post-Kickstarter.mdwn b/doc/forum/Post-Kickstarter.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d774ca25b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Post-Kickstarter.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +We're nearing the end of the year of development funded by Kickstarter. I'm curious to know what the future of the project looks like. + +I assume that development will decrease from its current levels as you focus more of your energy on activities that put bread on the table, but is git-annex still something that you foresee actively working on or will it be in more of a feature-freeze-bug-fix stage? + +As a backer my only regret is that during the campaign I wasn't able to donate as much as I would have liked. The project has exceeded my expectations since then. I don't know that another Kickstarter campaign is worth the effort, but if you were to ask for donations to fund another month or two or three I would gladly donate. Or perhaps implement a feature-bounty program where users could donate money toward development of a particular feature they would like to see added. Or perhaps you're sick of working for the Internet!