This commit is contained in:
parent
570aae9bbc
commit
12a0a45fb1
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
10
doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
Normal file
10
doc/todo/support_fsck_in_bare_repos.mdwn
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
What is says on the tin:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
22:56:54 < RichiH> joeyh_: by the way, i have been thinking about fsck on bare repos
|
||||
22:57:37 < RichiH> joeyh_: the best i could come with is to have a bare and a non-bare access the same repo store
|
||||
22:58:00 < RichiH> joeyh_: alternatively, with the SHA* backend, you have all the information to verify that the local data is correct
|
||||
22:58:41 < RichiH> and verifying that would already be a plus. if there really _is_ a problem, having the SHA is enough to track issues down
|
||||
23:09:50 < joeyh_> oh, I think I have code that fsck could use on bare repos already.. just a matter of wiring it up
|
||||
23:10:42 < joeyh_> feel free to reopen a bug or whatever so I remember.. the unused command's branch content enumeration could be used in a bare repo
|
||||
23:14:51 < joeyh_> unused/dropunused could work in bare repos too btw
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue