From 10e72acb0100820e30dab4398ba90b6232b56fcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://lithitux.org/openidserver/users/pavel" Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:14:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_6_f360f0006bc9115bc5a3e2eb9fe58abd._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/bugs/problem_with_upgrade_v2_-__62___v3/comment_6_f360f0006bc9115bc5a3e2eb9fe58abd._comment diff --git a/doc/bugs/problem_with_upgrade_v2_-__62___v3/comment_6_f360f0006bc9115bc5a3e2eb9fe58abd._comment b/doc/bugs/problem_with_upgrade_v2_-__62___v3/comment_6_f360f0006bc9115bc5a3e2eb9fe58abd._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0852db0795 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/problem_with_upgrade_v2_-__62___v3/comment_6_f360f0006bc9115bc5a3e2eb9fe58abd._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="https://lithitux.org/openidserver/users/pavel" + nickname="pavel" + subject="comment 6" + date="2011-07-06T08:14:26Z" + content=""" +Ah, great, thanks very much for the quick fix! + +Yes, when I mentioned three defunct git processes, there were three processes shown as \"git [defunct]\", plus the three git processes I listed, plus two \"git-annex\" processes. Upon cancel/resume, there were no defunct git processes when I checked, but by the time I found the bug report on the forum and commented I'd already successfully upgraded by annex (by repeatedly attaching strace) and couldn't really easily get at either additional 'ps' info or a fuller strace than what I posted (that was just the log from one of the attach/detach cycles), so it's a relief you managed to pinpoint the problem. +"""]]