comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c0ff6b8cd
commit
108c7d96dd
1 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="joey"
|
||||
subject="""comment 1"""
|
||||
date="2020-12-10T21:49:03Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
Answer first: Re-running export will skip over things that it knows
|
||||
it already exported before, so should be efficient.
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, it seems this is the same as the old issue where 2 files with the same
|
||||
key being sent to a remote concurrently failed like this. Fixed back then by
|
||||
skipping the second, redundant transfer. But in this case, since there are
|
||||
2 files on the remote, the data needs to be sent twice. So it probably just
|
||||
shouldn't guard against redundant transfers when exporting. Or if it does,
|
||||
it should use the ExportLocation, not the Key as what coulds as redundant..
|
||||
I will have to look at this later though.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue