From 0fc476f16e104595566bea84e8ac3d1d5679f8e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:52:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] comments --- ...omment_7_50516fc4b3c315a9e5d771777fb27e9f._comment | 11 +++++++++++ ...omment_8_87ad54a694bde70713e71acd4e074894._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_7_50516fc4b3c315a9e5d771777fb27e9f._comment create mode 100644 doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_8_87ad54a694bde70713e71acd4e074894._comment diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_7_50516fc4b3c315a9e5d771777fb27e9f._comment b/doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_7_50516fc4b3c315a9e5d771777fb27e9f._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c0408483c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_7_50516fc4b3c315a9e5d771777fb27e9f._comment @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 7""" + date="2023-01-10T15:43:50Z" + content=""" +Older versions of git-annex will fail with the error shown in comment #3 +when trying to enable the second instance of the web remote. + +When autoenabling, it won't be a fatal error, but the ugly error message +will still be shown. +"""]] diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_8_87ad54a694bde70713e71acd4e074894._comment b/doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_8_87ad54a694bde70713e71acd4e074894._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ff4a17e810 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/Allow_for_URLs_prioritization_WITHIN___40__web__41___remote/comment_8_87ad54a694bde70713e71acd4e074894._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 8""" + date="2023-01-10T15:45:03Z" + content=""" +Setting default web to higher cost than the other web remotes doesn't avoid +this problem: If you have a bunch of urls on different sites that are an +averge speed, and one site that is slow, you'd have to make a new web remote +for each individual site, and for each new site. +"""]]