From 0ed90ae99246c44a36c8956124c1c645cb845809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "http://joey.kitenet.net/" <joey@web>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:45:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_1_0e40f158b3f4ccdcaab1408d858b68b8._comment   | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Behaviour_of_fsck/comment_1_0e40f158b3f4ccdcaab1408d858b68b8._comment

diff --git a/doc/forum/Behaviour_of_fsck/comment_1_0e40f158b3f4ccdcaab1408d858b68b8._comment b/doc/forum/Behaviour_of_fsck/comment_1_0e40f158b3f4ccdcaab1408d858b68b8._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..dc48e2f943
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Behaviour_of_fsck/comment_1_0e40f158b3f4ccdcaab1408d858b68b8._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
+ nickname="joey"
+ subject="comment 1"
+ date="2011-03-24T17:45:08Z"
+ content="""
+I tend to agree that the default output of fsck is not quite right. I often use git annex fsck -q. A progress spinner display is a good idea.
+"""]]