From c660bc4a71ff40a1b8c932ca230de6f96647838b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: spwhitton Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:39:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Added a comment --- .../comment_2_93eec60060bc7bca8dd1633b670f9a53._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/__34__git_add__34___vs___34__git_annex_add__34___in_v6/comment_2_93eec60060bc7bca8dd1633b670f9a53._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/__34__git_add__34___vs___34__git_annex_add__34___in_v6/comment_2_93eec60060bc7bca8dd1633b670f9a53._comment b/doc/forum/__34__git_add__34___vs___34__git_annex_add__34___in_v6/comment_2_93eec60060bc7bca8dd1633b670f9a53._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..721a1d0c1f --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/__34__git_add__34___vs___34__git_annex_add__34___in_v6/comment_2_93eec60060bc7bca8dd1633b670f9a53._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="spwhitton" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/9c3f08f80e67733fd506c353239569eb" + subject="comment 2" + date="2018-04-27T16:39:49Z" + content=""" +Is the `git annex -a` benefit one of performance? I.e. the reason why the pre-commit hook approach was less good was that could be slower? +"""]] From fdcbcba84f3437f0fe551ab7cc3b772182b09912 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: spwhitton Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:15:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Added a comment --- ...comment_3_f63a66196db731fb04d8e078136eeb3d._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Joey__44___when_would_you_guess_v6_to_be_ready__63__/comment_3_f63a66196db731fb04d8e078136eeb3d._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/Joey__44___when_would_you_guess_v6_to_be_ready__63__/comment_3_f63a66196db731fb04d8e078136eeb3d._comment b/doc/forum/Joey__44___when_would_you_guess_v6_to_be_ready__63__/comment_3_f63a66196db731fb04d8e078136eeb3d._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ec929fa6dc --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Joey__44___when_would_you_guess_v6_to_be_ready__63__/comment_3_f63a66196db731fb04d8e078136eeb3d._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="spwhitton" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/9c3f08f80e67733fd506c353239569eb" + subject="comment 3" + date="2018-04-27T17:15:24Z" + content=""" +Seems like the main thing is waiting for patches to git to migrate to systems like Debian stable. + +Joey, have your patches been merged? +"""]] From bf6c6fa30c352dd8f29c53786007f0cfa2151335 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: davicastro Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 21:06:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Added a comment: Where does gitolite stores the annex objects contents? --- .../comment_25_08b3b257b3dbd32cb807e29f512ea9c9._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/tips/using_gitolite_with_git-annex/comment_25_08b3b257b3dbd32cb807e29f512ea9c9._comment diff --git a/doc/tips/using_gitolite_with_git-annex/comment_25_08b3b257b3dbd32cb807e29f512ea9c9._comment b/doc/tips/using_gitolite_with_git-annex/comment_25_08b3b257b3dbd32cb807e29f512ea9c9._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7b52cb8ace --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/tips/using_gitolite_with_git-annex/comment_25_08b3b257b3dbd32cb807e29f512ea9c9._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="davicastro" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/4e708663cf4d5b9e8cfea74caf4307fc" + subject="Where does gitolite stores the annex objects contents?" + date="2018-04-27T21:06:42Z" + content=""" +Hi. Does anyone knows where does gitolite stores the annex objects' contents? (I got it to work, and git annex is working fine, but I want to \"see the annex files\" in the central gitolite server. And it puzzles me I can't find them! It definitively is not in the repo.git bare repository under the gitolite admin repositores folder) +"""]]