comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
de1bd0d6b8
commit
0c3a3c5187
1 changed files with 35 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|||
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||||
username="joey"
|
||||
subject="""comment 2"""
|
||||
date="2015-10-01T15:45:18Z"
|
||||
content="""
|
||||
My original reasoning makes sense for uploads, I think.
|
||||
|
||||
The checksum library used is a lot faster now, but it would still be best
|
||||
to do the checksum as part of the same file read used to transfer the file,
|
||||
when possible.
|
||||
|
||||
There is a good reason to want to verify checksums when downloading objects
|
||||
too: Git does that, and so if git-annex does too, the same reasoning about
|
||||
security can be done about git-annex repositories as can be done about git
|
||||
repositories. In other words, not verifying checksums when downloading objects
|
||||
violates least surprise.
|
||||
|
||||
A concrete example: If the user is uploading objects to gitlab, they should
|
||||
be able to git pull, and verify their signed commit, and git annex get, and
|
||||
not need to worry about whether gitlab (or a MITM) could do something evil
|
||||
to the downloaded objects.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly, a S3 special remote does not include the git repo, so users
|
||||
should be able to assume that, given their locally trusted git repo, git
|
||||
annex get will only ever get verified objects from the S3 remote.
|
||||
|
||||
Question: What about local repositories, eg on a removable drive?
|
||||
Git does do checksum verification between local repositories, unless
|
||||
cloned with --shared. Probably follows git-annex should too.
|
||||
|
||||
My current thinking is that this verification should be done by default.
|
||||
Security features that are not enabled by default are not very useful.
|
||||
It should, however, be able to be turned off, either globally, or on a
|
||||
per-remote basis.
|
||||
"""]]
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue