mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages 1 Wiki Activity Actions

Merge remote-tracking branch 'branchable/master'

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2011-03-30 15:29:23 -04:00
commit 0a8fea2836
2 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_5_5bb128f6d2ca4b5e4d881fae297fa1f8._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 5"
date="2011-03-30T18:59:19Z"
content="""
This is brain-storming only so the idea might be crap, but a branch could keep encrypted filenames while master keeps the real deal. This might fit into the whole scheme just nicely or break future stuff in a dozen places, I am not really sure yet. But at least I can't forget the idea, now.
"""]]

8
doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_6_63fb74da342751fc35e1850409c506f6._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 6"
date="2011-03-30T19:02:20Z"
content="""
OTOH, if encryption makes a bup backend more likely disregard the idea above ;)
"""]]