mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Merge remote-tracking branch 'branchable/master'

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Joey Hess 2011-03-30 14:33:54 -04:00
commit 06a0458ec8
2 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_3_e1f39c4af5bdb0daabf000da80858cd9._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://joey.kitenet.net/"
nickname="joey"
subject="comment 3"
date="2011-03-30T18:15:18Z"
content="""
Yes, encrypting the symmetric key with users' regular gpg keys is the plan.
I don't think that encryption of content in a git annex remote makes much sense; the filenames obviously cannot be encrypted there. It's more likely that the same encryption would get used for a bup remote, or with the [[special_remotes/directory]] remote I threw in today.
"""]]

8
doc/bugs/S3_bucket_uses_the_same_key_for_encryption_and_hashing/comment_4_bb6b814ab961818d514f6553455d2bf3._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawl9sYlePmv1xK-VvjBdN-5doOa_Xw-jH4U"
nickname="Richard"
subject="comment 4"
date="2011-03-30T18:20:56Z"
content="""
Picking up the automagic encryption idea for annex remotes, this would allow you to host a branchable-esque git-annex hosting service. (Nexenta with ZFS is a cheap and reliable option until btrfs becomes stable in a year or five).
"""]]