From 058783704a386cb2ebce79e938d01a6de0655772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Antoine=20Beaupr=C3=A9?= Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:02:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] mention quvi as a possible solution for youtube support --- ...handling_of_Youtube_URLs_in_Web_special_remote.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/todo/wishlist:_special-case_handling_of_Youtube_URLs_in_Web_special_remote.mdwn b/doc/todo/wishlist:_special-case_handling_of_Youtube_URLs_in_Web_special_remote.mdwn index 4227678ba8..3e08bb8d9f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/wishlist:_special-case_handling_of_Youtube_URLs_in_Web_special_remote.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/wishlist:_special-case_handling_of_Youtube_URLs_in_Web_special_remote.mdwn @@ -10,3 +10,13 @@ The [[Web special remote|special remotes/web]] could possibly be improved by det > this. > > --[[Joey]] + +> > There's a library for this called [quvi][] which supports many +> > different sites and also allows fetching the URL (as opposed to just +> > downloading the file). It seems to me this would be the best tool +> > for this task. One problem to consider here is that a single youtube +> > URL may yield different file contents depending on the quality +> > chosen. Also, it seems that the URLs guessed by quvi may be +> > ephemeral. --[[anarcat]] +> > +> > [quvi]: http://quvi.sourceforge.net/