From 0cba1debdae1166a41e3c5497067276f8a28c6bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukey <Lukey@web>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:09:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Added a comment

---
 .../comment_4_b7eead64e39b5ebb1a22131b4e35251e._comment   | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Unlocked_mode_without_data_also_under_.git__47__annex__63__/comment_4_b7eead64e39b5ebb1a22131b4e35251e._comment

diff --git a/doc/forum/Unlocked_mode_without_data_also_under_.git__47__annex__63__/comment_4_b7eead64e39b5ebb1a22131b4e35251e._comment b/doc/forum/Unlocked_mode_without_data_also_under_.git__47__annex__63__/comment_4_b7eead64e39b5ebb1a22131b4e35251e._comment
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0e779dfec3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Unlocked_mode_without_data_also_under_.git__47__annex__63__/comment_4_b7eead64e39b5ebb1a22131b4e35251e._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="Lukey"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/c7c08e2efd29c692cc017c4a4ca3406b"
+ subject="comment 4"
+ date="2022-09-14T15:09:20Z"
+ content="""
+ZFS doesn't support reflinks. XFS does.
+"""]]

From 485e713a34bbf9a2ffc2f2b2ffedc016732dc6f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "eph@6377f195575d4a04abc70f20e0b00dffcc597d00" <eph@web>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:55:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2]

---
 doc/forum/Idly_syncing_back_and_forth_creates_commits.mdwn | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 doc/forum/Idly_syncing_back_and_forth_creates_commits.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/forum/Idly_syncing_back_and_forth_creates_commits.mdwn b/doc/forum/Idly_syncing_back_and_forth_creates_commits.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ee1c6a0102
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Idly_syncing_back_and_forth_creates_commits.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Say I have a git annex repository with one regular remote.  The status of both remotes is clean.
+
+If I run `git annex sync` in the main remote, it will not create any commits.
+
+However, running sync alternatively in both remotes will keep creating regular and merge commits.
+
+I wonder if it would be possible to avoid this behavior.