From 0320df26fee2713d8b367f963c697b12a3b21bec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://joeyh.name/" Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:21:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a comment --- ...comment_1_a5e5d410545fa7f93f08936ec6aeee42._comment | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/lsof_resource_use_problems/comment_1_a5e5d410545fa7f93f08936ec6aeee42._comment diff --git a/doc/forum/lsof_resource_use_problems/comment_1_a5e5d410545fa7f93f08936ec6aeee42._comment b/doc/forum/lsof_resource_use_problems/comment_1_a5e5d410545fa7f93f08936ec6aeee42._comment new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..55312113e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/lsof_resource_use_problems/comment_1_a5e5d410545fa7f93f08936ec6aeee42._comment @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="http://joeyh.name/" + ip="209.250.56.111" + subject="comment 1" + date="2014-10-13T21:21:18Z" + content=""" +That seems very wrong.. On my linux system here, I can `lsof /` and it uses 4 kb total, and runs in 0.09 seconds, to report on 3500 open files. + +But, I don't know about freebsd. lsof may be more expensive there for some reason, like needing to look in kernel memory rather than in /proc perhaps? But expensive to the tune of gigabytes of space used, that must be lsof misbehaving. +"""]]