mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

typo

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
http://lj.rossia.org/users/imz/ 2012-09-25 20:19:48 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 6735b06537
commit 025e210e7d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/todo/wishlist:_backends_for_other_peer_network_data_stores___40__gnunet__44___freenet__41__.mdwn
View file

@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ I mean gnunet, freenet, BitTorrent (also trackerless).
Before dropping a file locally, the BitTorrent client should check that all parts are still available from the peers.
Of course, there is no guarantee assumed that the content won't disappear from the peer network in future: they act more like a cache rather than an archive you on whose lifespan you decide. (I'm only not sure about gnunet now: whether there is a rule of dropping unused content from it, like in freenet.)
Of course, there is no guarantee assumed that the content won't disappear from the peer network in future: they act more like a cache rather than an archive on whose lifespan you decide. (I'm only not sure about gnunet now: whether there is a rule of dropping unused content from it, like in freenet.)
Also networks like namecoin (derived from bitcoin) can be used as a key-value store. Despite being a peer network, a system like namecoin actually could offer the publisher more control over the lifespan of the content: he should be able to offer "financial" reward for others processing his key-value data. (But I'm not sure namecoin is designed reasonably for this reward system to work actually; but there might be appearing other similar systems.)