Typo fix unncessary -> unnecessary.

Detected while reading recent CHANGELOG entry but then decided to apply
to entire codebase and docs since why not?
This commit is contained in:
Yaroslav Halchenko 2022-08-19 17:45:04 -04:00 committed by Joey Hess
parent f091eff476
commit 0151976676
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DB12DB0FF05F8F38
43 changed files with 60 additions and 60 deletions

View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
subject="""comment 13"""
date="2021-05-31T18:40:59Z"
content="""
There was an unncessary check of the current time per sql insert, removing
There was an unnecessary check of the current time per sql insert, removing
that sped it up by 3 seconds in my benchmark.
Also tried increasing the number of inserts per sqlite transaction from 1k

View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ reasons:
painful for the android port, other builds like debian mips that don't
currently support TH, etc. (Update: mips does support it now, it seems!)
* I think it's responsible for at least 50% of the executable size, and I
suspect a lot of that is unncessary bloat for parts of yesod that
suspect a lot of that is unnecessary bloat for parts of yesod that
git-annex doesn't really use.
* Hamlet constantly annoys me by rejecting any file that contains tabs.
**Rage**

View file

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ flowing, it's almost certainly stalled. And if the progress display is
updated less frequently, see if it's updated every 2 minutes, etc. Although
realistically, progress displays are updated every chunk, and there's
typically more than 1 chunk per minute. So longer durations than 1 minute
may be an unncessary complication. And a minute to detect a stall is fine.
may be an unnecessary complication. And a minute to detect a stall is fine.
> Implemented this, annex.stalldetection = true enables automatic.

View file

@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ The suggestion that this could be used for
[[todo/option_to_add_user-specified_string_to_key]] raises its own security
concerns. (Although git's sha1 collision hardening probably will survive
until git sha256, so git-annex's attempts to prevent sha1 collisions via
user-supplied data in the content of keys are probably unncessary.)
user-supplied data in the content of keys are probably unnecessary.)
"""]]

View file

@ -35,5 +35,5 @@ commit -a`). Afterwards, `git status` then smudged it again, unsure why!
> because restagePointerFile uses the git queue, and unlock
> also queues a git add or something, so the queue isn't able to built
> up because two dissimilar things are being queued. This seems an
> unncessary behavior; it could queue up all the git adds and then
> unnecessary behavior; it could queue up all the git adds and then
> run restagePointerFile after them all. Implemented that, and [[done]]! --[[Joey]]

View file

@ -30,5 +30,5 @@ Actually -- it made me think: is that `scanning` branch specific? then what woul
[[!meta author=yoh]]
[[!tag projects/datalad]]
> I feel this is unncessary complexity and I've optimised the scans quite a
> I feel this is unnecessary complexity and I've optimised the scans quite a
> lot in the meantime, so [[wontfix|done]] --[[Joey]]

View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
subject="""comment 3"""
date="2019-06-26T14:51:32Z"
content="""
That seems like an unusual use case that would be unncessary complication
That seems like an unusual use case that would be unnecessary complication
to add to git-annex, but that [[external_backends]] could be used to
implenent as needed.
"""]]

View file

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ For details of the older todo, including some timings with and without
prelinking, see [[!commit c4229be9a7a2318ef71b9ae433bc14bf604c9caf]].
A ghc bug, since fixed, was causing it to look in IIRC, thousands of
unncessary directories per library. This todo, by contrast, complains about
unnecessary directories per library. This todo, by contrast, complains about
less than 100 extra lookups total.
The way you run the shim does not put the bundled git in PATH. That kind of

View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Export conflicts happen whenever two repos export different trees
to the same special remote.
Some conflicts that seem trivial currently involve unncessary unexporting
Some conflicts that seem trivial currently involve unnecessary unexporting
and re-uploading in their resolution.
For example, if A exports a tree containing `[foo]`, and B exports a tree