mirrors/git-annex
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added a comment: SHA performance

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
http://nanotech.nanotechcorp.net/ 2012-08-10 04:37:33 +00:00 committed by admin
parent 96fe122d09
commit 0076c613c0
1 changed files with 13 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
doc/backends/comment_1_375bb1fb5973e8fa67b763f2dd6e404b._comment Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
[[!comment format=mdwn
username="http://nanotech.nanotechcorp.net/"
nickname="NanoTech"
subject="SHA performance"
date="2012-08-10T04:37:32Z"
content="""
It turns out that (at least on x86-64 machines) `SHA512` [is faster than][1] `SHA256`. In some benchmarks I performed<sup>1</sup> `SHA256` was 1.8–2.2x slower than `SHA1` while `SHA512` was only 1.5–1.6x slower.
`SHA224` and `SHA384` are effectively just truncated versions of `SHA256` and `SHA512` so their performance characteristics are identical.
[1]: https://community.emc.com/community/edn/rsashare/blog/2010/11/01/sha-2-algorithms-when-sha-512-is-more-secure-and-faster
<sup>1</sup> `time head -c 100000000 /dev/zero | shasum -a 512`
"""]]