2015-04-12 23:12:31 +00:00
|
|
|
If you look at the transfer rates during a copy job to remotes, you see it going down to zero for a short time between files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While that's understandable from rsync's PoV, it's not as efficient as git-annex could be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would parallelization be an option? Are there alternate improvements?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Richard
|
2018-10-03 16:52:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I think that git-annex switching to the P2P protocol for ssh transfers
|
|
|
|
|
> fixed this; it doesn't have the overhead of starting up rsync each time,
|
|
|
|
|
> and even multiple transfers go over the same ssh connection, which also
|
|
|
|
|
> adds efficiency. [[done]] --[[Joey]]
|
