2015-03-03 22:59:49 +00:00
|
|
|
This month is going to be a bit more random than usual where git-annex
|
|
|
|
development is concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* On Saturday, the [Seven Day Roguelike](http://7drl.org/) competition
|
|
|
|
begins, and I will be spending a week building a game in haskell,
|
|
|
|
to the exclusion of almost all other work.
|
|
|
|
* On March 18th, I'll be at the [Boston Haskell User's group](http://www.meetup.com/Boston-Haskell/events/219298257/).
|
|
|
|
(Attending, not presenting.)
|
|
|
|
* March 19-20, I'll be at Dartmouth visiting with the DataLad developers
|
|
|
|
and learning more about what it needs from git-annex.
|
|
|
|
* March 21-22, I'll be at the FSF's [LibrePlanet](https://libreplanet.org/2015)
|
|
|
|
conference at MIT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got started on the randomness today with this
|
|
|
|
[[design proposal for using git-annex to back up the entire Internet Archive|design/iabackup]].
|
|
|
|
This is something the Archive Team is [considering taking on](http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=INTERNETARCHIVE.BAK),
|
|
|
|
and I had several hours driving and hiking to think about it and came up
|
2015-03-04 22:54:44 +00:00
|
|
|
with a workable design. (Assuming large enough crowd of volunteers.)
|
2015-03-03 22:59:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know if it will happen, but it was a useful thought problem to see how
|
|
|
|
git-annex works, and doesn't work in this unusual use case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One interesting thing to come out of that is that git-annex fsck does not
|
|
|
|
currently make any record of successful fscks. In a very large distributed
|
|
|
|
system, it can be useful to have successful fscks of an object's content recorded,
|
|
|
|
by updating the timestamp in the location log to say "this repository still
|
|
|
|
had the content at this time".
|