use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex (6.20180309) upstream; urgency=medium
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-09 17:56:21 +00:00
|
|
|
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files over ssh
|
use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
|
|
|
|
will no longer be preserved when copying them to and from ssh remotes.
|
|
|
|
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
|
|
|
|
this is not considered a regression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name> Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:22:47 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git-annex (6.20170228) upstream; urgency=medium
|
2017-02-28 17:28:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This version of git-annex has mitigations for SHA1 hash collision
|
|
|
|
problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A new annex.securehashesonly configuration, when used in combination with
|
|
|
|
signed git commits, avoids potential hash collision problems in git-annex
|
|
|
|
repositories. For details, see this web page:
|
|
|
|
<https://git-annex.branchable.com/tips/using_signed_git_commits/>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name> Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:28:50 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex (6.20170101) upstream; urgency=medium
|
2016-12-27 20:36:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XMPP support has been removed from the assistant in this release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your repositories used XMPP to keep in sync, that will no longer
|
|
|
|
work, and you should enable some other remote to keep them in sync.
|
|
|
|
A ssh server is one way, or use the new Tor pairing feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <id@joeyh.name> Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:37:46 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex (4.20131002) upstream; urgency=low
|
2016-05-24 05:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The layout of gcrypt repositories has changed, and
|
|
|
|
if you created one you must manually upgrade it.
|
|
|
|
See /usr/share/doc/git-annex/html/upgrades/gcrypt.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:55:23 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex (3.20120123) upstream; urgency=low
|
2016-05-24 05:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was a bug in the handling of directory special remotes that
|
|
|
|
could cause partial file contents to be stored in them. If you use
|
|
|
|
a directory special remote, you should fsck it, to avoid potential
|
|
|
|
data loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example: git annex fsck --from mydirectory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:24:23 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex (3.20110624) upstream; urgency=low
|
2016-05-24 05:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There has been another change to the git-annex data store.
|
|
|
|
Use `git annex upgrade` to migrate your repositories to the new
|
|
|
|
layout. See <http://git-annex.branchable.com/upgrades/> or
|
|
|
|
/usr/share/doc/git-annex/html/upgrades.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant change this time is that the .git-annex/ directory
|
|
|
|
is gone; instead there is a git-annex branch that is automatically
|
|
|
|
maintained by git-annex, and encapsulates all its state nicely out
|
|
|
|
of your way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should make sure you include the git-annex branch when
|
|
|
|
git pushing and pulling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:18:00 -0400
|
|
|
|
|
use P2P protocol for checkpresent, retrieve, and store
Note that, due to not using rsync to transfer files to ssh remotes
any longer, permissions and other file metadata of annexed files
will no longer be preserved when copying them to ssh remotes.
Other remotes never supported preserving that information, so
this is not considered a regression. Added NEWS item about this.
Another significant side effect of this is that, even when rsync is run to
retrieve a file, its progress display will no longer be shown, and
instead the native git-annex progress display will appear. It would be
possible to use the rsync process display when rsync is used (old
git-annex-shell and also retrieval from a local repository), but it
would have complicated the code unncessarily, and been inconsistent
behavior.
(I'd been thinking for a while about eliminating the rsync progress
display, since it's got some annoying verbosities, including display of
the key and the "(xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)" bit and was already somewhat
inconsistent.)
retrieveKeyFileCheap still uses rsync, since that ensures that it gets
the actual file content from the remote. Using the P2P protocol would
use the local content, as long as the local and remote size are the
same.
This commit was sponsored by John Pellman on Patreon.
2018-03-09 16:57:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex (0.20110316) upstream; urgency=low
|
2016-05-24 05:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This version reorganises the layout of git-annex's files in your repository.
|
|
|
|
There is an upgrade process to convert a repository from the old git-annex
|
|
|
|
to this version. See <http://git-annex.branchable.com/upgrades/> or
|
|
|
|
/usr/share/doc/git-annex/html/upgrades.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:49:15 -0400
|