13 lines
622 B
Text
13 lines
622 B
Text
|
[[!comment format=mdwn
|
||
|
|
username="https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawmX5gPNK35Dub-HzR0Yb3KXllbqc0rYRYs"
|
||
|
|
nickname="Eduardo"
|
||
|
|
subject="bucket/folder s3 remotes"
|
||
|
|
date="2012-08-09T10:52:07Z"
|
||
|
|
content="""
|
||
|
|
it'd be really nice being able to configure a S3 remote of the form `<bucket>/<folder>` (not really a folder, of course, just the usual prefix trick used to simulate folders at S3). The remote = bucket architecture is not scalable at all, in terms of number of repositories.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
how hard would it be to support this?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
thanks, this is the only thing that's holding us back from using git-annex, nice tool!
|
||
|
|
"""]]
|