2012-10-08 17:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
git-annex tries to ensure that the configured number of [[copies]] of your
|
|
|
|
data always exist, and leaves it up to you to use commands like `git annex
|
|
|
|
get` and `git annex drop` to move the content to the repositories you want
|
|
|
|
to contain it. But sometimes, it can be good to have more fine-grained
|
|
|
|
control over which repositories prefer to have which content. Configuring
|
|
|
|
this allows `git annex get --auto`, `git annex drop --auto`, etc to do
|
|
|
|
smarter things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, preferred content settings can only be edited using `git
|
|
|
|
annex vicfg`. Each repository can have its own settings, and other
|
|
|
|
repositories may also try to honor those settings. So there's no local
|
|
|
|
`.git/config` setting it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea is that you write an expression that files are matched against.
|
|
|
|
If a file matches, it's preferred to have its content stored in the
|
|
|
|
repository. If it doesn't, it's preferred to drop its content from
|
|
|
|
the repository (if there are enough copies elsewhere).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expressions are very similar to the file matching options documented
|
|
|
|
on the [[git-annex]] man page. At the command line, you can use those
|
|
|
|
options in commands like this:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 20:09:21 +00:00
|
|
|
git annex get --include='*.mp3' --and -'(' --not --largerthan=100mb -')'
|
2012-10-08 17:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The equivilant preferred content expression looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 20:09:21 +00:00
|
|
|
include=*.mp3 and (not largerthan=100mb)
|
2012-10-08 17:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 20:09:21 +00:00
|
|
|
So, just remove the dashes, basically. However, there are some differences
|
|
|
|
from the command line options to keep in mind:
|
2012-10-08 17:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 20:09:21 +00:00
|
|
|
### difference: file matching
|
2012-10-10 17:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 20:09:21 +00:00
|
|
|
While --include and --exclude match files relative to the current
|
2012-10-08 17:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
directory, preferred content expressions always match files relative to the
|
2012-10-10 17:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
top of the git repository. Perhaps you put files into `archive` directories
|
2012-10-08 17:16:53 +00:00
|
|
|
when you're done with them. Then you could configure your laptop to prefer
|
|
|
|
to not retain those files, like this:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-10 17:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
exclude=*/archive/*
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-19 20:09:21 +00:00
|
|
|
### difference: no "in="
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred content expressions have no direct equivilant to `--in`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Often, it's best to add repositories to groups, and match against
|
|
|
|
the groups in a preferred content expression. So rather than
|
|
|
|
`--in=usbdrive`, put all the USB drives into a "transfer" group,
|
|
|
|
and use "copies=transfer:1"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### difference: dropping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To decide if content should be dropped, git-annex evaluates the preferred
|
|
|
|
content expression under the assumption that the content has *already* been
|
|
|
|
dropped. If the content would not be preferred then, the drop can be done.
|
|
|
|
So, for example, `copies=2` in a preferred content expression lets
|
|
|
|
content be dropped only when there are currently 3 copies of it, including
|
|
|
|
the repo it's being dropped from. This is different than running `git annex
|
|
|
|
drop --copies=2`, which will drop files that current have 2 copies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A wrinkle of this approach is how `in=` is handled. When deciding if
|
|
|
|
content should be dropped, git-annex looks at the current status, not
|
|
|
|
the status if the content would be dropped. So `in=here` means that
|
|
|
|
any currently present content is preferred, which can be useful if you
|
|
|
|
want manual control over content. Meanwhile `not (in=here)` should be
|
|
|
|
avoided -- it will cause content that's not here to be preferred,
|
|
|
|
but once the content arrives, it'll stop being preferred and will be
|
|
|
|
dropped again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## difference: "present"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's a special "present" keyword you can use in a preferred content
|
|
|
|
expression. This means that content is preferred if it's present,
|
|
|
|
and not otherwise. This leaves it up to you to use git-annex manually
|
|
|
|
to move content around. You can use this to avoid preferred content
|
|
|
|
settings from affecting a subdirectory. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto/* or (include=ad-hoc/* and present)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that `not present` is a very bad thing to put in a preferred content
|
|
|
|
expression. It'll make it prefer to get content that's not present, and
|
|
|
|
drop content that is present! Don't go there..
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-10 17:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
## standard expressions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git-annex comes with some standard preferred content expressions, that can
|
|
|
|
be used with repositories that are in some pre-defined groups. To make a
|
|
|
|
repository use one of these, just set its preferred content expression
|
|
|
|
to "standard", and put it in one of these groups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### client
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content is preferred, unless it's in a "archive" directory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`exclude=*/archive/*`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use for repositories that are used to transfer data between other
|
|
|
|
repositories, but do not need to retain data themselves. For
|
|
|
|
example, a repository on a server, or in the cloud, or a small
|
|
|
|
USB drive used in a sneakernet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The preferred content expression for these causes them to get and retain
|
|
|
|
data until all clients have a copy.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-14 20:21:18 +00:00
|
|
|
`not (inallgroup=client and copies=client:2) and exclude=*/archive/*`
|
2012-10-14 20:01:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-10-14 20:21:18 +00:00
|
|
|
The "copies=client:2" part of the above handles the case where
|
2012-10-14 20:01:16 +00:00
|
|
|
there is only one client repository. It makes a transfer repository
|
|
|
|
speculatively prefer content in this case, even though it as of yet
|
|
|
|
has nowhere to transfer it to. Presumably, another client repository
|
|
|
|
will be added later.
|
2012-10-10 17:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### archive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content is preferred, unless it's already been archived somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`not copies=archive:1`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that if you want to archive multiple copies (not a bad idea!),
|
|
|
|
you should instead configure all your archive repositories with a
|
|
|
|
version of the above preferred content expression with a larger
|
|
|
|
number of copies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### backup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content is preferred.
|