2013-11-04 21:30:53 +00:00
|
|
|
I've been investigating ways to implement a [[/todo/direct_mode_guard]].
|
|
|
|
Preventing a stray `git commit -a` or `git add` doing bad things in a
|
|
|
|
direct mode repository seems increasingly important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, considered moving `.git`, so git won't know it's a git repository.
|
2013-11-25 20:40:19 +00:00
|
|
|
This doesn't seem *too* hard to do, but there will certainly be unexpected
|
2013-11-04 21:30:53 +00:00
|
|
|
places that assume `.git` is the directory name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dislike it more and more as I think about it though, because it moves
|
|
|
|
direct mode git-annex toward being entirely separate from git, and I don't
|
|
|
|
want to write my own version control system. Nor do I want to complicate
|
|
|
|
the git ecosystem with tools needing to know about git-annex to work in
|
|
|
|
such a repository.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, I'm happy that one of the other ideas I tried today seems quite
|
|
|
|
promising. Just set core.bare=true in a direct mode repository. This nicely
|
|
|
|
blocks all git commands that operate on the working tree from doing
|
|
|
|
anything, which is just what's needed in direct mode, since they don't know
|
|
|
|
how to handle the direct mode files. But it lets all git commands and other
|
|
|
|
tools that don't touch the working tree continue to be used. You can even
|
|
|
|
run `git log file` in such a repository (surprisingly!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It also gives an easy out for anyone who really wants to use git commands
|
|
|
|
that operate on the work tree of their direct mode repository, by just
|
|
|
|
passing `-c core.bare=false`. And it's really easy to implement in
|
|
|
|
git-annex too -- it can just notice if a repo has core.bare and
|
|
|
|
annex.direct both set, and pass that parameter to every git command it
|
|
|
|
runs. I should be able to get by with only modifying 2 functions to
|
|
|
|
implement this.
|