061e2e5e73
* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 113.0.5645.0 * chore: update patches/chromium/mas_avoid_usage_of_private_macos_apis.patch Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4300129 Fix simple code shear * chore: update patches/chromium/build_only_use_the_mas_build_config_in_the_required_components.patch Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4297496 Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4327491 patch-fuzz update; no manual changes * chore: remove patches/chromium/fix_x11_window_restore_minimized_maximized_window.patch Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4252946 Upstreamed by zcbenz, so local patch is no longer needed * chore: update chromium/printing.patch Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4313019 Remove cookie parameter from PrintViewManagerBase::UpdatePrintSettings() * chore: remove NOTIMPLEMENTED BrowserProcessImpl::GetBreadcrumbPersistentStorageManager() Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4247145 method removed upstream, so we do not need to add a stub for it in the subclass * chore: remove PrintViewManagerElectron::UpdatePrintSettings() Xref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4313019 Previously, our implementation checked to see if we recognized the cookie param that was passed in. If so, we reported a bad message. Otherwise, we passed it up to the base class' UpdatePrintSettings(). CL4313019 removed the cookie param, so checking for a bad cookie param is no longer necessary / no longer possible. Since the only remaining task was to pass the work up to the base class, this commit removes the subclass implmentation entirely. * chore: update patches * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 113.0.5647.0 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 113.0.5649.2 * chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 113.0.5651.0 * chore: update patches --------- Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Charles Kerr <charles@charleskerr.com> Co-authored-by: deepak1556 <hop2deep@gmail.com>
77 lines
3.5 KiB
Diff
77 lines
3.5 KiB
Diff
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Cheng Zhao <zcbenz@gmail.com>
|
|
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:45:03 -0700
|
|
Subject: blink_local_frame.patch
|
|
|
|
According to electron/electron#3699, it is unreliable to use |unload|
|
|
event for process.exit('exit'), so we have to do that in
|
|
willReleaseScriptContext.
|
|
|
|
Refs changes in:
|
|
* https://codereview.chromium.org/1657583002
|
|
* https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2596880
|
|
* https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2597169
|
|
|
|
This patch reverts the changes to fix associated crashes in Electron.
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/frame.cc b/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/frame.cc
|
|
index 22bf66cc28e084f062a0f90b547cd76ae3221ae4..2397739954dcbd60074cd173741db6971719ae30 100644
|
|
--- a/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/frame.cc
|
|
+++ b/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/frame.cc
|
|
@@ -124,14 +124,6 @@ bool Frame::Detach(FrameDetachType type) {
|
|
|
|
DCHECK(!IsDetached());
|
|
|
|
- // TODO(dcheng): FocusController::FrameDetached() *should* fire JS events,
|
|
- // hence the above check for `client_` being null. However, when this was
|
|
- // previously placed before the `FrameDetached()` call, nothing crashes, which
|
|
- // is suspicious. Investigate if we really don't need to fire JS events--and
|
|
- // if we don't, move `forbid_scripts` up to be instantiated sooner and
|
|
- // simplify this code.
|
|
- ScriptForbiddenScope forbid_scripts;
|
|
-
|
|
if (type == FrameDetachType::kRemove) {
|
|
if (provisional_frame_) {
|
|
provisional_frame_->Detach(FrameDetachType::kRemove);
|
|
@@ -155,6 +147,14 @@ bool Frame::Detach(FrameDetachType type) {
|
|
GetWindowProxyManager()->ClearForSwap();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
+ // TODO(dcheng): FocusController::FrameDetached() *should* fire JS events,
|
|
+ // hence the above check for `client_` being null. However, when this was
|
|
+ // previously placed before the `FrameDetached()` call, nothing crashes, which
|
|
+ // is suspicious. Investigate if we really don't need to fire JS events--and
|
|
+ // if we don't, move `forbid_scripts` up to be instantiated sooner and
|
|
+ // simplify this code.
|
|
+ ScriptForbiddenScope forbid_scripts;
|
|
+
|
|
// After this, we must no longer talk to the client since this clears
|
|
// its owning reference back to our owning LocalFrame.
|
|
client_->Detached(type);
|
|
diff --git a/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/local_frame.cc b/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/local_frame.cc
|
|
index 1dc927139acb50123c05cc651545b77181021f93..ee0ad7b562b6d9f6d85cca0cafdc031608e89e51 100644
|
|
--- a/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/local_frame.cc
|
|
+++ b/third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/local_frame.cc
|
|
@@ -620,10 +620,6 @@ bool LocalFrame::DetachImpl(FrameDetachType type) {
|
|
}
|
|
DCHECK(!view_ || !view_->IsAttached());
|
|
|
|
- // This is the earliest that scripting can be disabled:
|
|
- // - FrameLoader::Detach() can fire XHR abort events
|
|
- // - Document::Shutdown() can dispose plugins which can run script.
|
|
- ScriptForbiddenScope forbid_script;
|
|
if (!Client())
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
@@ -671,6 +667,11 @@ bool LocalFrame::DetachImpl(FrameDetachType type) {
|
|
DCHECK(!view_->IsAttached());
|
|
Client()->WillBeDetached();
|
|
|
|
+ // This is the earliest that scripting can be disabled:
|
|
+ // - FrameLoader::Detach() can fire XHR abort events
|
|
+ // - Document::Shutdown() can dispose plugins which can run script.
|
|
+ ScriptForbiddenScope forbid_script;
|
|
+
|
|
// TODO(crbug.com/729196): Trace why LocalFrameView::DetachFromLayout crashes.
|
|
CHECK(!view_->IsAttached());
|
|
SetView(nullptr);
|