chore: migrate base::StringPiece to std::string_view (#40915)

* chore: migrate from base::StringPiece to std::string_view in keyboard_util.cc

* chore: migrate from base::StringPiece to std::string_view in error_thrower.cc

* chore: migrate from base::StringPiece to std::string_view in electron_api_web_contents.cc

* chore: migrate from base::StringPiece to std::string_view in gin_helper/dictionary.h

* chore: migrate from base::StringPiece to std::string_view in electron_api_url_loader.cc

* chore: phase out internal use of base:::StringPiece

`base::StringPiece` is being phased out upstream. Its code has been
removed upstream and it's just a typedef for `std::string_view`.

They haven't removed the typedef yet, so this PR tries to get ahead
of future breakage by migrating "internal" use (i.e. leaving alone the
places where the `base::StringPiece` name is coming from an upstream
method that we override).

Xref: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=691162

Xref: 4294483

Xref: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d4RnD1uAE2t4iANR0nXy82ASIPGsPuw2mpO6v6T7JKs
This commit is contained in:
Charles Kerr 2024-01-10 19:00:37 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent 892c9d78a3
commit f36ceae024
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
45 changed files with 223 additions and 174 deletions

View file

@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
#ifndef ELECTRON_SHELL_COMMON_GIN_HELPER_OBJECT_TEMPLATE_BUILDER_H_
#define ELECTRON_SHELL_COMMON_GIN_HELPER_OBJECT_TEMPLATE_BUILDER_H_
#include <string_view>
#include "base/memory/raw_ptr.h"
#include "shell/common/gin_helper/function_template.h"
@ -28,7 +30,7 @@ class ObjectTemplateBuilder {
// poetic license here in order that all calls to Set() can be via the '.'
// operator and line up nicely.
template <typename T>
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetValue(const base::StringPiece& name, T val) {
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetValue(const std::string_view name, T val) {
return SetImpl(name, ConvertToV8(isolate_, val));
}
@ -37,19 +39,19 @@ class ObjectTemplateBuilder {
// will want to use one of the first two options. Also see
// gin::CreateFunctionTemplate() for creating raw function templates.
template <typename T>
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetMethod(const base::StringPiece& name,
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetMethod(const std::string_view name,
const T& callback) {
return SetImpl(name, CallbackTraits<T>::CreateTemplate(isolate_, callback));
}
template <typename T>
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetProperty(const base::StringPiece& name,
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetProperty(const std::string_view name,
const T& getter) {
return SetPropertyImpl(name,
CallbackTraits<T>::CreateTemplate(isolate_, getter),
v8::Local<v8::FunctionTemplate>());
}
template <typename T, typename U>
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetProperty(const base::StringPiece& name,
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetProperty(const std::string_view name,
const T& getter,
const U& setter) {
return SetPropertyImpl(name,
@ -60,10 +62,10 @@ class ObjectTemplateBuilder {
v8::Local<v8::ObjectTemplate> Build();
private:
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetImpl(const base::StringPiece& name,
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetImpl(const std::string_view name,
v8::Local<v8::Data> val);
ObjectTemplateBuilder& SetPropertyImpl(
const base::StringPiece& name,
const std::string_view name,
v8::Local<v8::FunctionTemplate> getter,
v8::Local<v8::FunctionTemplate> setter);