pve-kernel-thunderx/patches/kernel/0262-x86-bpf-jit-prevent-speculative-execution-when-JIT-i.patch

94 lines
3.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:11:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] x86, bpf, jit: prevent speculative execution when JIT is
enabled
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
CVE-2017-5753
CVE-2017-5715
When constant blinding is enabled (bpf_jit_harden = 1), this adds
a generic memory barrier (lfence for intel, mfence for AMD) before
emitting x86 jitted code for the BPF_ALU(64)_OR_X and BPF_ALU_LHS_X
(for BPF_REG_AX register) eBPF instructions. This is needed in order
to prevent speculative execution on out of bounds BPF_MAP array
indexes when JIT is enabled. This way an arbitary kernel memory is
not exposed through side-channel attacks.
For more details, please see this Google Project Zero report: tbd
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
(cherry picked from commit cf9676859a05d0d784067072e8121e63888bacc7)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 4d50ced94686..879dbfefb66d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -107,6 +107,27 @@ static void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
set_fs(old_fs);
}
+static void emit_memory_barrier(u8 **pprog)
+{
+ u8 *prog = *pprog;
+ int cnt = 0;
+
+ if (bpf_jit_blinding_enabled()) {
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC))
+ /* x86 LFENCE opcode 0F AE E8 */
+ EMIT3(0x0f, 0xae, 0xe8);
+ else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC))
+ /* AMD MFENCE opcode 0F AE F0 */
+ EMIT3(0x0f, 0xae, 0xf0);
+ else
+ /* we should never end up here,
+ * but if we do, better not to emit anything*/
+ return;
+ }
+ *pprog = prog;
+ return;
+}
+
#define CHOOSE_LOAD_FUNC(K, func) \
((int)K < 0 ? ((int)K >= SKF_LL_OFF ? func##_negative_offset : func) : func##_positive_offset)
@@ -399,7 +420,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
case BPF_ADD: b2 = 0x01; break;
case BPF_SUB: b2 = 0x29; break;
case BPF_AND: b2 = 0x21; break;
- case BPF_OR: b2 = 0x09; break;
+ case BPF_OR: b2 = 0x09; emit_memory_barrier(&prog); break;
case BPF_XOR: b2 = 0x31; break;
}
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
@@ -646,6 +667,16 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X:
+ /* If blinding is enabled, each
+ * BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW instruction
+ * is converted to 4 eBPF instructions with
+ * BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_AX, 32)
+ * always present(number 3). Detect such cases
+ * and insert memory barriers. */
+ if ((BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64)
+ && (BPF_OP(insn->code) == BPF_LSH)
+ && (src_reg == BPF_REG_AX))
+ emit_memory_barrier(&prog);
/* check for bad case when dst_reg == rcx */
if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_4) {
/* mov r11, dst_reg */
--
2.14.2