The known affected devices have had the battery display issues resolved.
xiaomi-beryllium and shift-axolotl were fixed in-kernel by Linux for
sdm845 version 5.19.7, and samsung-skomer works fine after backporting
the upstream Upower fix for the issue:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/upower/-/merge_requests/170
The sdm845 devices also work fine with just the Upower fix for what it's
worth. The kernel fix is redundant.
It's broken and I currently don't have any interest in fixing it or
maintaining it in general. If somebody wants to package it later they
can always restore it
Previously only cross/gcc{4,6}-* packages were adjusted in MR 3419, but
these packages need to be adjusted as well.
Fix for error shown in upstream_compat check:
Increase 'gcc6' pkgrel (10 -> 11), missing depend(s): isl
Increase 'gcc4' pkgrel (5 -> 6), missing depend(s): isl
Related: pmbootstrap issue 2167
[ci:skip-build] Already built successfully once
Firefox packaging changed upstream, renaming the desktop files. This
caused the mime applications to be stale, so update those.
See also
https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/13983
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
The sole purpose of this subpackage was to work around that Firefox's
.desktop file did not match the GTK app ID. This has been fixed as of
the commit linked below, so drop the subpackage.
See 525736254c
The firefox-esr package in versions >= 102.2.0-r1 installs to
/usr/lib/firefox-esr instead of /usr/lib/firefox, adjust FIREFOX_DIR
to match. Install for both firefox-esr and firefox now.
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
Switch to minimal config that I've been using for development for the
last months, with some minor modifications. In addition to that enable
all the kconfig options that will be a part of the new
pmb:kconfigcheck-community (anbox/waydroid + iwd + nftables + containers
+ zram + netboot).
Note by ollieparanoid:
Re-applied it after I just reverted it. Now realized that I didn't need
to revert this in the first place, this is and aarch64 package and the
cross compilers (x86_64 packages) needed to be published. Anyway, the
gcc mess is mostly resolved now, see issue 2167.
[ci:skip-build] Already built successfuly on CI in MR
Temporarily revert this, so bpo can first build and publish all gcc
cross packages. The build for this linux package currently failed - I
could also set it back to queued and have it build, but that would delay
the publish of the gcc-aarch64 package until the kernel is built.
This reverts commit 979cc0bfb6.
Removed isl as described in pmaports issue 2167. Verified locally that
gcc-aarch64 builds. Tried to test building packages with it, but wasn't
possible with the local build due to a bug, I'll create an issue and
link it in pmaports issue 2167. Pushing this now as it's a critical fix,
should work in theory as soon as the binary packages are built on bpo,
and right now it's broken anyway.
Switch to minimal config that I've been using for development for the
last months, with some minor modifications. In addition to that enable
all the kconfig options that will be a part of the new
pmb:kconfigcheck-community (anbox/waydroid + iwd + nftables + containers
+ zram + netboot).
[ci:skip-build] Already built successfuly on CI in MR
Add support for next devices:
- Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 and TF101G
- Asus Eee Pad Slider SL101
- Asus Transformer Prime TF201
- Asus Transformer Pad TF300T/TF300TG/TF300TL
- Asus VivoTab RT TF600T (Windows RT based)
- Asus Transformer Infinity TF700T
- Asus Transformer AiO P1801-T
- Asus Transformer PAD TF701T
- Pegatron Chagall based devices
Package has no dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Schwalm <maxim.schwalm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
Remove as we are removing apparmor check from pmbootstrap
[ci:skip-vercheck] No rebuild necessary
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully / also not really needed
A lame workaround for this[1] until something better comes along. Not
having a functional battery gauge on a mobile device is kind of painful.
1. pmaports issue 1677
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Smith <ollieparanoid@postmarketos.org>
Tested-by: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
[ci:skip-build] already built successfully in CI
